We are having a BASE meeting for Work Package 7, on 24 Feb, and invited some of the delegates to come the day before,
and present about their research on climate change adaptation in the CRPR Discussion Series. If you happen to be around Exeter on Monday 23 Feb, you are very welcome to attend! So it will be Monday 23
February, 3:45-5pm, Peter
Chalk Room 1.2, with:
(1)
Kirsi Makinen
(Finnish Environment Institute, SYKE) on ’The
many faces of adaptation policy: Analysis of Finland’s second generation
national adaptation policy and drivers for its evolution’ (research done
together with with Mikael Hilden)
(2) Anne
Jensen and Helle Orsted Nielsen (Aarhus University, Denmark) on understanding
climate policy integration.
See the abstracts below.
See the abstracts below.
Catherine Butler (also from University of Exeter, from the Geography Department) will share some
thoughts on this as a discussant.
The many
faces of adaptation policy: Analysis of Finland’s second generation national
adaptation policy and drivers for its evolution
A decade
since Finland adopted its first National Strategy for Adaptation to Climate
Change (NAS) in 2005, a number of adaptation policies have been initiated in
Europe at the EU and national levels. Following a comprehensive evaluation of
its NAS, Finland adopted a new National Climate Change Adaptation Plan
2022 in November 2014. By
looking at the Finnish experience in adaptation policy implementation and
revision, this paper seeks to gain insights into factors that shape the
evolution of adaptation policy. We address three main questions. Firstly, how
has adaptation and its overall framing in national policy changed from 2005 to
2014? Secondly, how and why do sectors differ in their implementation of
adaptation and what does this tell us about the driving forces behind
adaptation policy development? Finally, we look at what future role is there
for adaptation policy in integration and implementation of climate change
adaptation? The study is based on analysis of key policy documents supplemented
by interviews of sectoral policymakers involved in national adaptation policy.
Our preliminary findings indicate that national adaptation policy in Finland is
primarily originated and driven by civil service actors, while extreme weather
events have also played a role in shaping adaptation policy. Between
sectors, interesting
differences arise in the level of implementation and with respect to multilevel
action across local, regional and national levels of administration. Such
differences can be explained by historical and current events and practice. In
times of prevailing calls for “leaner” government, flexible regulations and
measures may seem a more likely direction for future adaptation policy than
normative regulation. With this likely direction in overall adaptation policy
(of which the proposed Climate Act, currently under debate in Parliament, is
indicative), differences in sectoral progress in adaptation may continue to
widen until extreme events or other external pressures become so strong that
adaptation becomes more visible on the political agenda as a matter of
increasing concern for both politicians and interest groups.
Understanding Climate Policy Integration
Anne
Jensen and Helle Ørsted Nielsen (Department of Environmental Sciences, Aarhus
University)
Across the EU, member states, cities and regions are
addressing the challenge of managing impacts of climate change which has
implied adoption of national strategies in a number of countries. Among
policy makers as well as in academia, there is growing concern for how to
successfully implement adaptation policy and address issues that involve a wide
range of actors and areas of society and which involve uncertainty in scale of
impacts and effect of instruments. Advancing the adaptation policy objectives,
the sectoral organisation of public policy has shown to halter development of
climate adaptation actions (Adele and Russel, 2013); in other sectors
adaptation objectives may be overshadowed or opposed by sectoral policy
objectives, reflecting opposing interests or relatively lower positions on
policy agendas. Concomitantly, policies and policy actions at one level are
influenced by policies and policy actions at other levels of policy making,
from European to local/city level (Mickwitz et al, 2009). Thus, the
coordination of climate adaptation objectives with policy issues and objectives
across sectors and across levels of policy making emerges as crucial, and
integration of climate policy objectives appear as vital for effective climate
adaptation. In this presentation we examine the links between national and
local climate adaptation policies, specifically how the national strategy has
framed policy action in local government. In doing so, we focus on
institutional drivers and barriers for integration of adaptation objectives and
activities across policy sectors at the local level.
No comments:
Post a Comment